Information from the Web Learn more about where we find additional information on the web. Checking the Web Library Staff Details Staff view. Keyboard Shortcuts Close Available anywhere? Shortcut help message s Highlight search box esc Close dialog. Available in search results n Next page p Previous page f Toggle filters Open nth result on page. However, students can lower the cost of a bachelor's degree by exploring scholarships, grants, and fellowships, and by looking for less expensive options.
For example, online students save on commuting, parking, and childcare costs. Bringing in transfer credits also lowers the cost of a bachelor's degree. Students may consider completing college credits at a community college before enrolling in a bachelor's program. Students enrolled in a bachelor's program can complete some or all of their general education requirements through a community college after ensuring that those credits will transfer toward their bachelor's degree.
The Academy of Certified Political Analysts offers a certificate in political science for candidates with an accredited degree who have two or more years of experience in politics, government, or public service. Applicants must meet continuing education requirements.
Also offered by the Academy of Certified Political Analysts, this certificate recognizes political analysts with a minimum of 18 hours of political science courses at an accredited institution with a 2. Political science majors with a background in campaign work qualify for this certification if they have an accredited political science degree and two years of relevant experience. Candidates must agree to ethical standards and meet continuing education requirements. Public policy specialists can apply for this certification, which recognizes candidates who meet educational and work experience requirements.
Applicants must pass all their political science classes with a minimum 2. Political science majors may pursue a teaching license after graduation. In some states, an undergraduate degree in political science fulfills the educational requirements, while others may require additional teacher preparation training. Because the requirements vary by state, political science majors should research their specific state's pathway to becoming a K educator. It also provides a job board with open positions.
The internship database at the APSA helps political science majors identify opportunities in the federal government, Congress, and other political agencies. It also includes resources on how to turn an internship into job opportunities. Published by the APSA, the journal represents the premier venue for scholarly writing in political science.
The journal dates back to and publishes scholarship in all areas of political science. The national honor society for political science students, PSA offers scholarship opportunities, awards, grants, and student leadership opportunities for members. With a focus on American foreign policy and global affairs since , Foreign Affairs provides a print magazine, a website, and other mediums to read analyses of foreign politics. Foreign Affairs also publishes book reviews. Political science students benefit from joining professional organizations, which provide networking opportunities and professional development resources for students planning careers in multiple fields.
These organizations often host an annual conference, provide resources geared toward students, and offer scholarship and award opportunities. Members also receive access to recent publications and journals to stay current in their field. Many professional organizations also host career centers with job postings in political science.
The most important professional organization in political science, APSA hosts an annual conference, publishes research, and provides resources for political science majors about the job market and professional development. Dating back to , ISPA promotes global collaboration on political science, with publications, awards, and summer school programs for scholars and students. Dedicated to political philosophy and theory, APT offers an annual conference, provides teaching resources, and publishes work in the field for students and professionals.
A nonprofit organization and publisher, the APS publishes the Political Science Quarterly, a journal on politics, policy, and government. The academy also hosts conferences and publishes books. Specifically for students, IAPSS posts calls for papers, provides academic resources, and offers professional development support to members worldwide. Resources for Political Science Students.
Collapse All. Pi Sigma Alpha The national honor society for political science students, PSA offers scholarship opportunities, awards, grants, and student leadership opportunities for members. Foreign Affairs With a focus on American foreign policy and global affairs since , Foreign Affairs provides a print magazine, a website, and other mediums to read analyses of foreign politics. A global politics specialty emphasizes the interconnected nature of modern politics. Students may concentrate on one region or a single country, such as studying the EU or China.
The degree may involve international relations courses and include a foreign language element. Public policy students study the development of government policy and its impact on communities and the nation. In addition to studying federal policy from the executive or legislative branches, students may also study state and local policy. The concentration also involves tracking public policy outcomes. Comparative politics applies the comparative method to national governments.
This may include the development of governmental systems, bilateral foreign policy, or comparative public policy. Liberalism has demonstrated an almost unprecedented capacity for absorbing its competitors, aided by the collapse of its rival, Marxism, but also by its own virtuosity in reinventing itself and incorporating key elements from opposing traditions. Having won over many erstwhile critics in the metropolitan centers, liberals now more readily acknowledge that there are significant traditions of thought beyond those that helped form Western liberalism.
They acknowledge, moreover, that the grounds for rejecting these other traditions are more slippery than previously conceived. Many were incensed at the suggestion that their claims about universal justice, equality, or human rights had no independent grounding, and accused the skeptics of abandoning normative political theory see, for example, Benhabib et al. In the course of the s, however, anti-foundationalism moved from being a contested minority position to something more like the consensus. In the wake, however, of Rawls and Habermas disavowing metaphysical support for their clearly normative projects, Western political theorists have increasingly acknowledged the historical contingency of their own schools of thought; and this is generating some small increase in interest in alternative p.
Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Positive and Negative Liberty" by Ian Carter - PhilPapers
The awareness of these traditions does not, of itself, signal a crisis of confidence in liberal principles arch antifoundationalist Richard Rorty certainly has no trouble declaring himself a liberal , but it does mean that political theory now grapples more extensively with questions of moral universalism and cultural or religious difference e.
Euben ; Parekh ; Honig The explosion of writing on multiculturalism—largely from the s—is particularly telling here. Multiculturalism is, by definition, concerned with the multiplicity of cultures: It deals with what may be radical differences in values, belief-systems, and practices, and has been especially preoccupied with the rights, if any, of nonliberal groups in liberal societies. Will Kymlicka famously defended group rights for threatened cultural communities on the grounds that a secure cultural context is necessary to individual autonomy, such that the very importance liberals attach to individual autonomy requires them to support multicultural policies.
His version of liberal multiculturalism has been widely criticized and many continue to see liberalism as at odds with multiculturalism for example, Okin ; ; Barry Liberalism simultaneously makes itself the defining tradition and notices the awkwardness in this. Its very dominance then seems to spawn an increasing awareness of traditions other than itself. It is not entirely clear why this has happened now liberalism, after all, has been around for many years but that useful shorthand, globalization, must provide at least part of the explanation.
And although political theorists have drawn heavily on the liberal tradition in their explorations of human rights or global justice, the very topics they address require them to think about the specificity of Western political thought. Political theory now roams more widely than in the past, pondering accusations of ethno-centricity, questioning the significance of national borders, engaging in what one might almost term a denationalization of political theory. That description is an overstatement, for even in addressing explicitly global issues, political theory draws on concepts that are national in origin, and the assumptions written into them often linger into their more global phase.
Terms like nation or state are not going to disappear from the vocabulary of political theory—but the kinds of shift Chris Brown discerns from international to global conceptions of justice are being played out in many corners of contemporary political thought. It is hard to predict how this will develop, although the combination of a dominant liberalism with a concern that Western liberalism may have illegitimately centered itself looks unstable, and it seems probable that pockets of resistance and new alternatives to liberalism will therefore gain strength in future years.
It seems certain that moves to reframe political theory in a more self-consciously global context will p. This is already evident in the literature on equality, democracy, and social justice, where there is increasing attention to both international and global dimensions. It is also becoming evident in new ways of theorizing religion. But other dimensions are now emerging, including new ways of understanding the politics of secularism, and closer examination of the normative arguments developed within different religions.
It seems likely that new developments in science particularly those associated with bio-genetics will provide political theorists with difficult challenges in the coming decade, especially as regards our understanding of the boundaries between public and private, and the prospects for equality. And while the prospect of a more participatory or deliberative democracy remains elusive, we can perhaps anticipate an increasing focus on the role of pleasure and passion in political activism. The optimistic take on this is that gender is no longer a distinct and separate topic, but now a central component in political thought.
The more pessimistic take is suggested in Zerilli : that the attempt to think politics outside an exclusively gender-centered frame may end up reproducing the blind spots associated with the earlier canon of political thought. We noted earlier the sometimes difficult relationship between political theory and the rest of political science. We return to this here, but more with a view to areas of cooperation. Here and there, methodology, public administration, political psychology, and public law might be added; and truly adventurous departments may stretch to political economy and environmental politics.
All these subfields have a p.
- Read It and Weep (Library Lovers Mystery, Book 4);
- Gravity Wells: Speculative Fiction Stories?
- Academic Tools!
- Freedom and Liberty.
- ECODESIGN -- The Competitive Advantage.
- Political Science.
- Individual liberty and the importance of the concept of the people!
These connections confirm the importance of political theory to the rest of political science. International relations has a well-defined sub-subfield of international relations IR theory, and we have noted that this is defined largely in terms of the three grand positions of realism, constructivism, and liberalism.
Confusingly, liberalism in IR is not quite the same as liberalism in political theory. In IR theory, liberalism refers to the idea that actors can cooperate and build international institutions for the sake of mutual gains; it is therefore linked to a relatively hopeful view of the international system. Realism, in contrast, assumes that states maximize security in an anarchy where violent conflict is an ever-present possibility.
Constructivism points to the degree to which actors, interests, norms, and systems are social constructions that can change over time and place. Each of these provides plenty of scope for engagement with political theory—even if these possibilities are not always realized. Despite its differences, IR liberalism connects with the liberalism of political theory in their shared Lockean view of how governing arrangements can be established, and when it comes to specifying principles for the construction of just and legitimate international institutions.
Thucydides has also been an important if contestable resource for realism Monoson and Loriaux Constructivism has been represented for example, by Price and Reus-Smit as consistent with Habermasian critical theory. As Scheuerman points out, critical theory has reciprocated, in that it now sees the international system as the crucial testing ground for its democratic prescriptions.
Normative theory is currently flourishing in international relations, and many of the resources for this are provided by political theory Cochran , with postmodernists, Rawlsian liberals, feminists, and critical theorists making particularly important contributions. The connections between comparative politics and political theory are harder to summarize because many of the practitioners of the former are area specialists with only a limited interest in theory. Those comparatists who use either large- n quantitative studies or small- n comparative case studies are often more interested in simple explanatory theory, one source of which is rational choice theory.
But there are also points of engagement with political theory as we understand it. The comparative study of social movements and their relationships with the state has drawn upon the idea of the public sphere in democratic political theory, and vice versa. Accounts of the role of the state in political development have drawn upon liberal constitutionalist political theory.
More critical accounts of the state in developing societies have drawn upon Marxist theory. In the last two decades democratization has been an important theme in comparative politics, and this work ought to have benefited from a dialogue with democratic theory. Unfortunately this has not happened. Studies of p. Recent work on race and diaspora studies in a comparative context is perhaps a more promising site of connection, invoking Tocqueville see also Bourdieu and Wacquant ; Hanchard And theorists working on multiculturalism and race have been especially attentive to comparative politics questions about the variety of governmental forms and their interaction with cultural difference Carens ; Kymlicka ; Taylor ; Gilroy Methodology might seem the subfield least likely to engage with political theory, and if methodology is thought of in terms of quantitative techniques alone, that might well be true.
However, methodology is also home to reflection on what particular sorts of methods can do. Here, political theorists are in an especially good position to mediate between the philosophy of social science on the one hand, and particular methods on the other. Taylor and Ball point to the inevitable moment of interpretation in the application of all social science methods, questioning the positivist self-image of many of those who deploy quantitative methods.
The inter-disciplinarity that characterizes so much political theory provides especially fruitful material for methodological reflection.
From Rawls and Dworkin onwards, work on principles of justice and equality has carried definite policy implications regarding taxation, public expenditure on health, the treatment of those with disabilities, and so on. Normative reasoning applied to public policy largely defines the content of Philosophy and Public Affairs , though this reasoning involves moral philosophy as much as or more than political theory.
Policy evaluation and design are important parts of the public policy subfield, and both require normative criteria to provide standards by which to evaluate actual or potential policies. Again, political theory is well placed to illuminate such criteria and how one might think about handling conflicts between them for example, when efficiency and justice appear to point in different directions.
It is also well placed to explore the discourse aspects of public policy, an aspect that has been an especial interest of the Theory, Policy, and Society group of the American Political Science Association. Among the linkages this group develops are those between p. Cutting across all the subfields of political science in recent decades has been rational choice theory, grounded in microeconomic assumptions about the wellsprings of individual behavior.
Indeed, to some of its practitioners, rational choice is what should truly be described as political theory. This claim does not hold up: As explanatory theory, rational choice theory is increasingly regarded as a failure Green and Shapiro But many believe that it is very useful nevertheless. Game theory, for example, can clarify what rationality is in particular situations Johnson , thereby illuminating one of the perennial questions in political theory.
And despite the frequent description of rational choice theory as value free, it has provided for plenty of normative theorizing among its practitioners. The conclusions of rational choice theory are often bad news for democracy Barry and Hardin ; but it is possible to reinterpret this edifice in terms of critical theory, as showing what would happen if everyone behaved according to microeconomic assumptions. The political challenge then becomes one of how to curb this destructive behavioral proclivity Dryzek Leading comparativist Bo Rothstein has expressed the worry that the empirical arm of the discipline has lost its moral compass.
Despite the likelihood of some resistance to this from both sides of the divide, the examples discussed above suggest that such connection or reconnection is indeed possible. We have argued that political theory is something of a mongrel sub-discipline, made up of many traditions, approaches, and styles of thought, and increasingly characterized by its borrowing from feminist and critical theory, film theory, popular culture, mass media, behavioral science, and economics.
The current academy confronts two opposing trends. One draws the boundaries of each discipline ever more tightly, sometimes as part of a bid for higher status, sometimes in the not totally implausible belief that this is the route to deeper and more systematic knowledge. Another looks to the serendipitous inspirations that can come through cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary work; or, more simply and modestly, realizes that there may be much to learn from other areas of study.
It is hard to predict which of p. We hope and believe that the second trend will turn out to be the dominant one. Ackerman, B. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, Conn. Find this resource:. Agamben, G. Stanford, Calif. Althusser, L. For Marx. London: Allen Lane. Reading Capital. London: Verso. Anderson, E. What is the point of equality?. Ethics , — Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reflections on Little Rock. Dissent , 6: 45— On Revolution. New York: Viking. Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt. Arneson, R. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies , 77— Ashcraft, R. Political theory and the problem of ideology. Journal of Politics , — We the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship , trans. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. New York: Verso. Ball, T. Deadly hermeneutics: or Sinn and the social scientist. Barry, B. Political Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cambridge: Polity. Rational Man and Irrational Society? Beverly Hills, Calif. Benhabib, S. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange.
New York: Routledge. Bennett, J. The moraline drift. In The Politics of Moralizing , ed. Bennett and M. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Berlin, I. Four Essays on Liberty. Bohman, J. The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy , 6: — Bookchin, M. The Ecology of Freedom.
Freedom and Liberty: Selected full-text books and articles
Palo Alto, Calif. Bourdieu, P. On the cunning of imperialist reason. Theory, Culture and Society , 41— Brown, C. From international to global justice? Dryzek, B. Honig, and A. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Butler, J. Carens, J. Cochran, M. Normative Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, G. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge, Mass. Cohen, J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. Hamlin and P. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Cohen, M. War and Moral Responsibility. The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion. Equality and Preferential Treatment. Connolly, W. The Terms of Political Discourse. Lexington, Mass. Democracy and territoriality. Millennium , — Dagger, R. Communitarianism and republicanism. Gaus and C.
London: Sage. Dean, J. Political theory and cultural studies. Deleuze, G. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Der Derian, J. Boulder, Colo. Derrida, J. Dryzek, J. New York: Cambridge University Press. How far is it from Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public choice as critical theory. British Journal of Political Science , — Dunn, J. New York: HarperCollins. Dworkin, R. On not prosecuting civil disobedience. New York Review of Books , 10 10 June. Taking Rights Seriously. What is equality? Part 1: equality of welfare; Part ii: equality of resources.
Philosophy and Public Affairs , —;. Elshtain, J. New York: Basic Books.
David Easton’s Political Theory
Euben, R. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage. Fraser, N.